Another entertaining and considered article today by Charlie Brooker (you can read the whole thing here), really enjoy his column in the Guardian. His most recent musings were on the BNP’s latest political broadcast; unfortunately (I think) I missed the production but thought it was worth a viewing considering Brooker’s assessment. And the fact that he described designers as having a “thoughtful and inquisitive nature”.
He described the graphics that accompanied the BNP’s ad as “gaudy and cheap, like a bad pizza menu”, a perfect description I think. The production value is terrible, and like Brooker says, if the BNP were the greatest British party, they’d have the greatest designers working with them, but they don’t.
The whole thing is pretty awful, from the scripts and sound
quality to the colour combinations and graphics… god knows what the little blue
men represent! It’s pretty shoddy, summed up by the opening line by Nick
Griffin… please, please, please “don’t turn it off”. If racism and bigotry
isn’t enough to make most people turn off, I don’t know what is. See what you
think.
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a010536ad494c970b01157090e486970b
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
A powerful post Ed. I'm also passionately against the BNP, this article is definitely worth a read.
I do think though that for all the poor crafting and design of the broadcast, the one thing the article neglects to say is that even with this shoddy presentation, the BNP are gaining inroads into the political system in Britain.
The stupidity of our MPs relating to expenses and the financial climate we find ourselves in only helps their cause, and I'm concerned that soon we will have a BNP MP, a first for our country to have an elected Fascist MP.
The camera work, graphics and scripting maybe poor, but with their extreme messages that appeal to the increasing disenfranchised members of our society, does it really matter? The proof that people are watching it is when I can see how many people have searched for this BNP video on Google and ended up watching it here on DesignYak, It's quite scary.
I absolutely agree. The progress the BNP has been making over recent years is definitely worrying. Of course they are going to exploit recent events regarding MPs expense claims and try to offer security to future generations employment prospects when there is currently such uncertainty.
But the fact that the production looks so amateurish should really be a representation of what the party is offering, if people are looking to them for solutions, this should be a visualisation of what they’ll get. To quote Charlie Brooker again, “don’t vote for those nasty slick parties. Vote for a shoddy one!”
People are always going to look for alternatives considering the situation we currently find ourselves in, and as a result this video is going to be seen whether it’s on the Yak or Youtube, my hope is that people will take note of the clumsily read lines and strange visuals and realise the BNP is not the answer.
Compare the Swastika adopted by the Nazi party to these strange blue men or the logo on the BNP’s website, the feelings it instantly generates demonstrates how emotive political imagery can be. In my opinion the shoddy craftsmanship displayed by the BNP only goes to show their ineptitude and inability to offer any kind of alternative.
There are so many ways to promote a business both online and offline. Each have their own set of advantages and disadvantages, and a business owner should test as many of them out as possible to find out if it's worth the time and/or money investment.
Agreed: the movie posters are lame bnyeod measure, regardless of politics. And including Griffin is a very, very cheap shot. I'm sure we could find unpleasant individuals to feature on the other side. I'm not sure why the BNP is opposed to AV or PR: surely they'd pick up some votes from UKIP and Tories.
A powerful post Ed. I'm also passionately against the BNP, this article is definitely worth a read.
I do think though that for all the poor crafting and design of the broadcast, the one thing the article neglects to say is that even with this shoddy presentation, the BNP are gaining inroads into the political system in Britain.
The stupidity of our MPs relating to expenses and the financial climate we find ourselves in only helps their cause, and I'm concerned that soon we will have a BNP MP, a first for our country to have an elected Fascist MP.
The camera work, graphics and scripting maybe poor, but with their extreme messages that appeal to the increasing disenfranchised members of our society, does it really matter? The proof that people are watching it is when I can see how many people have searched for this BNP video on Google and ended up watching it here on DesignYak, It's quite scary.
Posted by: Steve Leard | May 18, 2009 at 23:36
I absolutely agree. The progress the BNP has been making over recent years is definitely worrying. Of course they are going to exploit recent events regarding MPs expense claims and try to offer security to future generations employment prospects when there is currently such uncertainty.
But the fact that the production looks so amateurish should really be a representation of what the party is offering, if people are looking to them for solutions, this should be a visualisation of what they’ll get. To quote Charlie Brooker again, “don’t vote for those nasty slick parties. Vote for a shoddy one!”
People are always going to look for alternatives considering the situation we currently find ourselves in, and as a result this video is going to be seen whether it’s on the Yak or Youtube, my hope is that people will take note of the clumsily read lines and strange visuals and realise the BNP is not the answer.
Compare the Swastika adopted by the Nazi party to these strange blue men or the logo on the BNP’s website, the feelings it instantly generates demonstrates how emotive political imagery can be. In my opinion the shoddy craftsmanship displayed by the BNP only goes to show their ineptitude and inability to offer any kind of alternative.
Posted by: Ed Read | May 19, 2009 at 00:27
He looks like a toad – the ugliest of all amphibians
Posted by: Cat Power | May 20, 2009 at 11:20
There are so many ways to promote a business both online and offline. Each have their own set of advantages and disadvantages, and a business owner should test as many of them out as possible to find out if it's worth the time and/or money investment.
Posted by: Banner Stands | September 11, 2009 at 00:32
Agreed: the movie posters are lame bnyeod measure, regardless of politics. And including Griffin is a very, very cheap shot. I'm sure we could find unpleasant individuals to feature on the other side. I'm not sure why the BNP is opposed to AV or PR: surely they'd pick up some votes from UKIP and Tories.
Posted by: Biia | August 01, 2012 at 04:41